The mirage of “Usable FX”: A rejoinder to Joe Jackson and the case for radical resource custodianship.

Guest Contributor: Ben Brako.

The recent analysis by Joe Jackson, CEO of Dalex Finance, regarding Ghana’s currency crisis and the “leaky bucket” of our export economy, provides a sobering, data-driven autopsy of our national malaise. Jackson correctly identifies that a positive trade balance is a hollow victory when 54% of gold revenue and 65% of oil revenue never truly enters the Ghanaian ecosystem. However, while Jackson proposes plugging these leaks through local content and domestic participation, his analysis stops short of the most uncomfortable, yet necessary, logical conclusion: If the current state of Ghana’s governance and technical capacity cannot safeguard more than half of our natural wealth, then the most patriotic and economically sound act is to cease extraction entirely.

We must move beyond the “Ananse” stories of trade surpluses and confront a deeper crisis of fiduciary duty. The government of Ghana is currently presiding over the liquidation of finite, non-renewable assets for a minority share of the returns. In doing so, it is not merely failing at economic management; it is violating the sacred tenets of intergenerational equity.

The Myth of Immediate Necessity and the Reality of Structural Leakage

The prevailing narrative in Accra is one of “extraction for development.” We are told we must mine gold and drill oil today to fund the schools, hospitals, and roads of tomorrow. Yet, as Jackson’s data proves, this is a mathematical fallacy. When the “retention rate” is as low as 34% for oil, we are effectively trading $1.00 worth of our children’s inheritance for 34 cents of “usable FX” that is immediately swallowed by debt servicing and the importation of foreign expertise.

This is not a trade; it is a fire sale. To put it in stark, numeric terms: for every $100 of wealth we pull from the earth, the nation effectively pays a $66 “tax” to foreign entities just to give away its future. Unlike a depreciating currency, gold and oil are “hard” assets. If we cannot retain 70% or 80% of their value, the most rational economic choice is to leave them unexploited, allowing them to appreciate while we build the capacity to harvest them ourselves.

Beyond Extraction: The Agricultural Bridge to Sovereignty

Critics of a “non-extraction” model rightly ask: how does a government survive fiscally during a moratorium?. The answer lies in the massive importation bills for commodities we have the capacity to produce. Ghana currently spends billions of dollars annually on imported rice, sugar, and poultry—staples that can be grown on our own soil.

By pivoting from a “grab-and-leak” extractive model to a “produce-and-save” agricultural model, we bridge the FX gap from the demand side. Instead of chasing elusive export dollars that leak out, we stop the outflow of the dollars we already have. This creates immediate domestic jobs and ensures that wealth stays entirely within the local ecosystem, answering the critique that capacity is built through “doing” rather than waiting. We must acknowledge the short-term revenue loss this shift entails, but it is a necessary “growing pain” to move from dependency to self-sufficiency.

Plugging the Financial Hole: Banking and Insurance

The “leaky bucket” is not limited to minerals; it extends deep into our financial services sector, which serves as a major conduit for profit repatriation. We must replace this dependency with robust local alternatives:
● Banking & Finance: We must incentivize the growth of indigenous banks to ensure that capital generated in Ghana remains in the domestic credit loop rather than being repatriated as dividends to foreign shareholders.
● Insurance: High-value risks in the mining and petroleum sectors must be underwritten by local firms. This prevents millions of dollars from leaking out as offshore premiums and builds the “Technical Capacity” and “Engineering Expertise” that critics claim we lack.
● Stricter Repatriation Management: We need a regulatory framework that requires a significant percentage of profits from foreign entities to be reinvested in Ghanaian infrastructure or local industry before they can be moved offshore.

The Doctrine of Intergenerational Custodianship

To understand why the current model is a moral failure, we look to our traditional jurisprudence. In our culture, the land is not the property of the living; it is a trust held for the “countless hosts yet unborn”. The President and Parliament are mere custodians. Their mandate is not to deplete the estate to solve a present liquidity crisis, but to safeguard it. While we acknowledge the intense pressures of present-day poverty, we must refuse to “eat the seed” of the future to satisfy the hunger of today.

The Risk of Waiting and Technological Disruption

Critics argue that resources unused are not automatically wealth and that technological shifts—such as a fall in lithium demand—could render our minerals worthless in the future. This is a valid concern that necessitates Strategic Awareness. We do not advocate for blind hoarding, but for a pause until our “Learning Curve” matches our “Extraction Rate”. If a global market shift threatens a resource’s future value, we may extract, but only under terms where the majority of the value is retained domestically. We must challenge the capitalist incentive to prioritize immediate profit over long-term stability.

Conclusion: A Call for Radical Governance

Joe Jackson has shown us the holes in the bucket. But the solution is not just to hire more Ghanaian plumbers to fix a foreign-owned bucket. The solution is to reclaim the bucket entirely.

Ghana travel guide

We are a wealthy nation being systematically unburdened of its wealth by a leadership that lacks the patience to wait for a full harvest. Let the gold stay in the rocks. Let the oil stay beneath the seabed. They are in safe-keeping for our grandchildren. Until we can exploit them to the full benefit of the Ghanaian citizen, we have no right to touch them. It is time for a new economic philosophy: Custodianship over Consumption.